O-Journalism |
| 8 common mistakes when writing for the web – and what to do about them Posted: 28 Feb 2012 01:12 AM PST ![]() Here is a checklist covering 8 mistakes made repeatedly by first-time web writers, which I’ve put together for one of my classes. The idea is simple: if you answer ‘No’ to any of these, carry on to the accompanying guidance that follows underneath. Checklist: are you doing the following?
Solving it: 1. The first parWhen you write the first draft of an article some people begin with a 'warming up' paragraph. Here's a classic example:
Here are some examples of cutting to the key facts:
Or, when your focus is an interview or guest post:
Or:
You can even start with the most colourful and attention-grabbing information gained in the interview, like so:
In short, if your paragraph is warming up, chop it out entirely – and look at each paragraph to see which one is the best to start with. If your article is trying to cover more than one basic angle, consider splitting it into two separate, shorter, posts. Don't tell us how you got hereAnother common mistake is to tell us about how you got to this point:
Remember the reader doesn't care how you got to this point – unless it's a stunning story in itself. So cut to the chase instead:
Solving it: 2. and 3. Linking to your sources – and linking phrases, not URLsAny mention of any information that you haven't gathered in its raw form yourself should include a link to the source. For example:
Should be linked to the source material as follows:
Note that I've also removed "official website" – for two reasons:
Here are some more examples:
The more links your work contains, the more value it holds for users – it's just good online journalism. Solving it: 4. Formatting text: blockquotes, bullet lists, and subheadingsOnline text is easier to read the more that it is broken up. Get to know the formatting panel just above the space where you write your post (shown below).
Solving it: 5. Splitting pars after every point is madeCompare the following:
And this:
That's from the BBC, an exemplar of good web writing. Try to keep pars short, and start new ones whenever a new point is being made. Solving it: 6. and 7. Headlines and subheadings – keep them specific and literalImagine what your headline looks like in the middle of a bunch of search results, or on Twitter. Imagine what it looks like to someone who has never read your site before, doesn't know you, or your culture, jokes and phrases. Here's an example of a bad headline: Useful contacts for everyone Again, imagine this in search engine results. Twitter contacts in what field? They're clearly not for "everyone" but something specific – in this case, the Olympics, so this is much better: 20 essential Olympics Twitter contacts Here's one that's even worse: An Update This tells us nothing unless we are already following the blog – and even then, it doesn't tell us whether this is interesting or merely functional. Try this instead: Update: unemployment up; Grayling’s 3 reasons; we want your questions! Don't be afraid of long headlines – look at how the Daily Mail use them (extremely successfully) on their website. Try and use key words and phrases in your headline so that search engines understand what they're about. This, for example, is bad: Match report This is much better: Rooney scores 4 in Roma Champions League clash …Because what will people be searching for? Rooney perhaps; Champions League; Roma. They might even be searching for "hat-trick" or "video". Think of how people search, and write your headline to answer that (assuming your content does too). SubheadingsThe same rules apply to subheadings. These serve two purposes: to break up your text so people can find their place in them more easily; and to help search engines understand your content. They should therefore be mini-headlines, with keywords relevant to the pars that follow. Solving it: 8. Ending your post – online is interactiveOne of the key ways in which online journalism differs from print or broadcast is that you are not dealing with an audience: you are dealing with potential collaborators and sources who can improve your journalism with a single comment. The traditional way of ending articles, then – implying that the story is finished and the reader can move on to what's on page 5 – does not apply. Instead you should try to leave room for the user to contribute in some way. Here are some examples:
|
| Creating dynamic visualisations using Google Forms and Google Gadgets Posted: 27 Feb 2012 11:11 AM PST If you need to gather data on the ground – or want to crowdsource data through an online form – this is how you can visualise the results as they come in using 3 Google Docs tools. They are:
And here’s the process: 1. Set up your spreadsheet
2. Setting up a Google FormYou’ll now be presented with a wizard for editing your form. The column headers will be used as question titles, and the spreadsheet title as the form title. Now you need to do some tweaking:
Note that once you start creating a form, Google Docs will add a new column, ‘Timestamp’, to your spreadsheet, which shows when data was entered. If you want to be alerted whenever any changes are made to a spreadsheet (by users, for example), go to Tools > Notification rules… and set them to your own preferences. 3. Visualising the results with Google GadgetsOnce your spreadsheet has some data on it (you or someone else, or both, have entered data using the form or the spreadsheet) you can start to publish a visualisation of the results. You may need to add an extra column or two to calculate numbers if your data doesn’t have them – for example, to count how many entries of different types (see this on the =COUNTIF formula for how to do that) or to add up ratings or generate average scores. Make sure that your formula will still work when new rows are added – for example, refer to a whole column by using (C:C) rather than (C2:C200).
You should now have a chart on your spreadsheet. 4. Embedding the chart on another webpage
Note: this won’t work on all webpages. For example, if you have a WordPress.com blog, any script that begins with <iframe> or <script> won’t work. That’s the final part of the process. In short, we have a Google Form, which is feeding data to a Google spreadsheet, which is feeding data to a Google gadget on a webpage. The data won’t update automatically, but automatic updating is one of various elements of customisation of Google Gadgets that you can do if you explore some of the documentation on Google Code. If you’ve any tips on using Google gadgets please let me know. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Online Journalism Blog To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |



0 comments:
Post a Comment